mbarrick: (Default)
[personal profile] mbarrick
From:  "absolute_anarchy_ca" <absolute_anarchy@h...>
Date:  Tue Apr 2, 2002  10:53 am
Subject:  Re: Welcome "AA" to our circle.

Thanks for the warm welcome.

Let's dive right in, eh? I've recently been turned on to Graham
Hancock's ideas about there having been a relatively advanced
civilisation with global trade networks during the ice age when the
ocean levels were douzens of metres lower than they are now. The major
cities of this civilisation were along the coast, just as they are
now, and when most of the ice melted, the cities were flooded (think
New York in A.I.), ending up deep under water, where we are only now
coming across them (Cuba, Bay of Cambay, etc. ). For example
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1345000/1345150.stm

So the question is how does the idea of a 10,000 year old, relatively
advanced human civilisation fit in with the notions of a
reptoid-orchestrated Illuminati consiracy as Icke proposes? (and of
which, I have to admit, I am somewhat ignorant - too many books, too
little time!)

--- In PurpleCrow2000@y..., "reptoid_27" <reptoid@h...> wrote:
> Hello, Purple. I found your group rather randomly
> while doing some research on antediluvial
> civilizations. I noticed some interesting stuff on
> your other list about "sea people" and was hoping to
> join up to discuss where the idea of ice-age era
> sunken cities from (re: Graham Hancock) 7,000 to
> 17,000 years ago might fit in with Icke's theories.
>
> -- AA
>
>
> (Reptoid opens the door, bows and smiles)
>
> Love,
> Reptoid.
> --------

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45 67 8910
11 121314 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 05:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios