mbarrick: (Default)
[personal profile] mbarrick
© 2002 Michael R. Barrick
The Canadian flag. And very Canadian it is. While other countries flags are steeped in history, our is steeped in separatist politics and bungling politicians. This flag was designed in 1965 to replace the official use of the Union Jack and the unofficial use of the Red Ensign (a red field with a Union Jack in the upper right quadrant and the coat of arm of Canada in the lower left quadrant) as the inherit Britishness of these flags didn't sit well with the Québecois. Rather ineptly it was proposed in parliament that a uniquely Canadian flag that both Anglophones and Francophones could rally around would help stem the (regularly scheduled) tide of separatism in Quebec. And an excellent flag was proposed: a red maple leaf centred on a white field, bounded by blue bars, representing Canada (the red maple leaf), the north (the white field), stretching from Atlantic to Pacific (the blue bars). But complaints were raised during the parliamentary debate over the design that the white, red and blue design was too much like the blue, white and red of the Union Jack and the red, white and blue of the dreaded Americans, allusions to either of which was not going to win any support in Quebec. Changing the leaf to blue was out of the question because the Québecois were already beginning to rally around the old pre-revolutionary blue and white French royal flag (which remains the provincial flag of Quebec). The "only" other option was to change the oceans to red. Why? Because the maple leaf *had* to stay red in deference to Red Ensign, which ultimately remained a nod to the British Loyalists (remember that the British uniform, before the days of camouflage was red... "the thin red line", "the redcoats are coming" and all that...) which was necessary to get the design past the old fuddy-duddies in the Senate. Getting the flag through, at the expense of the unifying symbolism that was supposed to be the point won the day. It never occurred to anyone, apparently, that the whole point of the flag was being subverted and that it would have been a much better flag if the leaf had been changed to green and the water left blue. But that is Canadian politics. In the end we ended up with a largely meaningless flag that the old British Loyalists aren't fond of and now, nearly 40 years later you still see a lot of Union Jacks (although the Maple Leaf does seem to have gained in the last 5-10 years as the people who were born under it tend to be more fond of it). The Québecois see it as an Anglophone flag as much as the Union Jack or Red Ensign and fly the Fleur de Lis as a "national" flag, typically insisting that it fly at the same height as the Maple Leaf rather than lower as would be befitting a provincial flag.

Date: 2002-08-22 08:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urban-creature.livejournal.com
From the one who works in Marketing at The Flag Shop, I commend you! Do you want to write an article for our bi-annual publication? *eyes your brain*
From: [identity profile] mbarrick.livejournal.com
Heh. Yeah that might be fun! How many words and what's the deadline?

Now here is a question for you: Walking from the bus to work today I was looking at the flags hung around the Hotel Vancouver (looks like they just bought shiny new ones all round) and there was one that I couldn't place off the top of my head. A yellow field with red bars above and below in about a 1:2:1 ratio.
From: [identity profile] urban-creature.livejournal.com
We're starting production in September, I'd have to look into deadlines and etc.... It'll only be my second one.

As for the flag, it sounds like Spain. Was there a crest on the middle left-hand side? Perhaps they have spanish visitors right now.

Brains are very alluring in a man.

No es EspaƱa

Date: 2002-08-22 10:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mbarrick.livejournal.com
That's what threw me. At first glance I thought it was Spain as well, but there is no crest. Nothing but red bars on a yellow field. I'm going to have to look it up or it will bug me all day.

”Es España!

Date: 2002-08-22 11:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mbarrick.livejournal.com
OK, it is Spain. The flag with the crest is the state flag and naval ensign, used for state functions and diplomatic missions and from naval ships. The flag without the crest is the national flag. So, in theory the one with the crest should only be used Spanish government buildings, at state ceremonies and on naval vessels. The hotel is rightly flying the national flag which is for the use of citizens and to represent the country abroad.

Re: No es EspaƱa

Date: 2002-08-22 11:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urban-creature.livejournal.com
Maybe it's South Vietnam? But the bars are thin and grouped together in the center of a yellow field....hmmmm..... I'll look into it. http://www.ftow.ca is a good site.

my stalwart sons and gentle maidens rise...

Date: 2002-08-22 09:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seymour-glass.livejournal.com
a green maple leaf would have been cool, then it would have looked like a pot leaf dude!!! then we could've said "dude, where's my country?"...it also would've looked like the old canucks logo, which i think is by far the coolest...it definitely would've been a unique flag...too bad they didn't have the guts to go through with it...but that's canada for you, capitulating to the powers that be...

Canucks logo

Date: 2002-08-22 09:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mbarrick.livejournal.com
Yes! The old one was the best. Good colours, graphically strong and simple, and actually had something to do with hockey! What the hell is up with these guys changing their look every few years? The other old teams like the Maple Leafs (hey... there's a blue maple leaf... ), the Rangers, the Flyers, even the Indians who have inadvertently become politically incorrect hang on to their traditions. You can't tell the Canucks from the lame-ass new teams from places where it never freezes, like the Sharks or *shudder* The Mighty Ducks.

How come a Jamacan bobsled team or a British ski-jumper are jokes, but hockey teams from places like Miami, Atlanta, and Los Angeles manage to be taken seriously?

Re: Canucks logo

Date: 2002-08-22 10:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seymour-glass.livejournal.com
well taken seriously by everyone except canadians...you know i have always been amazed that the canucks don't bring back the old jersey as a third jersey...especially the blue away one, it's sharp...and most teams are doing the retro and history thing...but i've heard that idiot brian burke freaks out whenever it's mentioned...so instead they have that shitty looking thing they chose last year...i mean the sales would be incredible for the old jersey...and isn't that all that matters to those guys???
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 05:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios