
I was watching the referrer log on my server today while testing something for work and happened to see that someone had hotlinked one of my pictures on newyork.craiglist.org. Some putz realtor was using a photo I made of the view of Downtown from the South Street Seaport to sell an apartment. People who hotlink should realise how easy it is to redirect to anything else...

The ad, redirected to a lovely picture of the Lower East Side at its spectacular mid-1970's low-point: |

no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
yay for justice served
btw, what, exactly, are "condo-like finishes"? and, "close to all subways" -- i realize i'm a prisoner of a relentless literalism, but it would be quite the hike to the nearest L or 7 stop, or the G, the B, the D, the N, the Q...
p.s.
Date: 2006-04-27 09:45 pm (UTC)Re: p.s.
Date: 2006-04-27 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 10:46 pm (UTC)to mr barrick: we love you.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 10:20 pm (UTC)yet this lefts out two questions:
1) how many visitors were before and after picture substitution ?
2) how soon webmasters realised sunstitution and fixed the ad
PS: most cruel of course would be to make picture IP-dependant, so that webmasters from craigslist.com still saw 1st picture, but al their clients saw substituted one :-)